Legal Online Gambling News

Penn National Withdrawn Its Lawsuit Against PA Mini-Casinos

Aug 03, 2018

Penn National has canceled their lawsuit against Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) and Gov. Tom Wolf. Originally Penn National objected to the new Category 4 casino licenses that legitimized the new mini-casinos in the state of Pennsylvania. 

Their case was based on the following points:

  • The Category 4 licenses are unfair to the existing operators use “unconstitutional” language and the federal courts should have stopped them going through.
  • Penn National would soon find itself suffering more damage, caused by the mini-casinos, than any of the other PA casinos.
  • Mount Airy Casino received preferential treatment since the law excluded new casinos within the three surrounding counties. The Mount Airy Casino pays a percentage of their revenue to these counties in return, while all other casinos share their revenue with the government of their home state.

 

Penn National to launch Two Mini-Casinos

Penn National’s objections did not stop them from making an incredible bid of $51.1 million for the first of the Category 4 licenses. However, while they may not have not come out as the winner of round 1, they did manage to buy the second license. Reports have shown that they plan to build two mini-casinos of their own – the first said to be close to York while the second will be located somewhere between Lancaster and Reading.

After the initial novelty and enthusiasm wore off after the first round, Penn National pay a mere $7,500,003.

 

“We made a business decision to withdraw our lawsuits against the Category 4 (casino) law.

“While we continue to believe in the merits of our arguments, we have chosen to focus entirely on our development efforts for our two new casinos, rather than pursue what is likely to be a lengthy and costly legal battle. As previously stated, our goal in pursuing our Cat4 licenses is both defensive, in terms of protecting our existing investment at Hollywood Casino from new competition, and offensive in terms of penetrating more deeply into more populous market areas to our south and east, in order to drive incremental value for our shareholders.”

-Eric Schippers, spokesman for Penn National

 

Penn National Concerned Over Cannibalization

After investing almost $60 million in licenses alone, it strange to think that if Penn National’s lawsuit were successful since it would have invalidated the exact licenses they just spent an incredible amount getting ahold of.

Another issue Penn National face after getting the license is the cannibalization of its existing businesses. The Category 4 license authorizes a geographical zone 25 miles around a central point. Penn National has previously argued that their Hollywood Casino currently attracts customers from far and wide, and a mini casino in the same area would have an adverse effect on its business. 

Now that they have their license, and prevented the competition from ‘fishing in their waters’, protecting a large part of their revenue catchment area, Penn National should feel less concerned with the cannibalization threat.

 

Legal Challenge From Sands Bethlehem Still Stands

While the decision to withdraw their lawsuit takes away one of the biggest obstacles facing state gambling laws. However, another remains - Penn National’s withdrawal from the lawsuit removes one possible risk to the state gambling laws, but another remains in play.

At the end of 2017, Sands Bethlehem filed a lawsuit. In their case, Sands Bethlehem claimed the new laws break both state and federal constitutional law because they require high revenue casinos to pay a tax that subsidizes the smaller casinos.

The money from this tax goes into a marketing fund. This benefits the smaller casinos, which has resulted in a prior case involving Mount Airy. They complained the host fees casinos paid to the municipalities of their catchment areas had a greater and more adverse effect on these smaller and less profitable casinos.

Overall, the marketing fund seems to have created more problems than it could ever hope to solve.

Unfortunately, Sands Bethlehem are unlikely to follow the example of Penn National and drop their lawsuit any time soon.

This web page is purely for entertainment purposes only, and may contain paid advertisements for online casinos, poker sites, and sportsbooks (including DraftKings, Fan Duel, and others.) When you play online or in person at casinos, you are always at risk to lose the money that you are wagering, and Bonus Seeker makes no claim or guarantee that you will win money. When gambling at a casino, only risk what you can comfortably afford to lose. You must be 21 years or older, and a US citizen to register at online casinos in New Jersey and other states in the US. Whilst we try to ensure that this information is correct, we do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. The information provided does not constitute advice and is intended only to provide general information. Bonus Seeker and its partners will not be responsible for any errors or omissions and we will not have any liability or responsibility for any loss that arises from any reliance placed on information obtained from this article including, but not limited to, the comments submitted by third parties. If you should require any advice for gambling-related problems, please CALL 1-800-GAMBLER.

© Copyright 2018 - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy